Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be-diversity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Be-diversity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. New neologism unveiled less than 48 hours ago (as of time this AfD was created). No independent coverage found, no outside references in the article. -- Finngall  talk  14:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm having some real difficulty even understanding what this page is about.  "Why to be normal?"  I guess this was either translated or written by non-native speaker.  Whatever it's about, it does not seem notable. Created a bit too soon by an enthusiastic fan, probably. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:23, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. S.G.(GH) ping! 14:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable neologism with no chance of growth any time soon. S.G.(GH) ping! 14:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism without outside coverage. 舎利弗 (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

ABOUT Be-diversity (The process of the creation of Be-diversity, was starting of course several months through the department of Media and Communications at Goldsmiths College, University of London. ( IS NOT less than a month old)). The neologism is in process of entering in common use. In fact it is attributable to a distinguished University, attributable to an influential event, attributable to a renown person, and spread out to the public. It has been coined in influential Goldsmiths University of London. It is attributable to a renown event that is the international Goldsmiths symposium “Critical ways of seeing”. It is attributable to a person that is eminent like Stefano Cagol (for example, BBC, The New York Times, Rai, Huffington Post, among others, spoke about his project on climate change for Maldives Pavilion at 55 Venice Biennale). The process of entering in common use already started: in fact – as Dan Savage did with his famous neologism “santorum” – there is a process of open call reflection spread out from the web and from University. This open call started before the symposium. --Leila Mai (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If it's still in the process of entering common use, it will be best to wait until an independent, reliable source covers it. Give it time. Wikipedia is most likely to be still around next year and the year after that. 舎利弗 (talk) 05:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear 舎利弗 (talk) - in fact - it is a Neologism (dictionary definition: a new word). if You wait for the common use, conceptually it will – not- be a neologism anymore! At the same time, this is an - art project -, of course supported by the prominent Goldshmits University of London. Leila Mai (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Please read the policy on neologisms. Your signature is also broken. It transcludes templates that display the current time such that it changes every time the page reloads. Please correct this. Simply place four tildes ( ~ ) to sign. There's no need to do it manually, if that's what you're doing. 舎利弗 (talk) 23:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.