Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be-mag

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:27, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)

Be-mag
Minor internet forum; a Google search for "be-mag forum" gives 18 hits. --Carnildo 08:30, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. - Mailer Diablo 09:27, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can't see how a forum having trolls makes it worth including in an encyclopedia. Not notable. Mgm|(talk) 10:48, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN. The article sounds like vanity for "the infamous EZ GOEAZY" anyway.   &mdash; Asbestos | Talk 11:20, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete message boards are inherently non-notable unless they achieve importance outside their interior community. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:28, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as web cruft. Wyss 08:13, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete. GRider\talk 17:52, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, the reason is obvious. Bart133 03:21, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.