Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeFunky Photo Editor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

BeFunky Photo Editor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability, and highly promotional. About 1.3 the references are from their own site. The other 2/3 are from PR Web or similar sources, or reprinted from there--a very impressive collection of press releases, but that's all they are. accepted from AfC, which is not surprising  DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Substantive coverage in Bloomberg, Complex, TechCrunch and Yahoo Finance means that this easily meets the qualifications of WP:GNG. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:33, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; most coverage is regurgitating PRs. Stifle (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 20:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources are primary, PR or trivial in their coverage. This is just WP:SPAM. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sourcing initially looks pretty solid, but it turns out to be built on press releases and trivial mentions.  There's no real significant coverage. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Articles more like an advert than anything. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  17:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.