Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeLUG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Lack of evidence for notability. PeaceNT 07:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

BeLUG

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was denied speedy deletion by db-empty, but I still believe it's a minimal article offering no content or context. It also appears to fail Wikipedia is not a directory guidelines. Dougie WII 12:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for the time being. The organization itself appears to be notable enough. If no substantial edit is done in the next week or so, then PROD. --Blanchardb 13:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that the subject may in fact be notable, but unless the article is dramatically improved, I don't see a reason why it should be on Wikipedia now. Dougie WII 13:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep The organization seems to be notable. But more references are needed here for this article. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 14:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as well. My first thought is that it should easily be deep-sixed as it doesn't even attempt to really establish notability, but as stated above it hasn't had a lot of time. Let's give the benefit of the doubt to the creator and assume he or she created it with the intention to improve it (and perhaps should have put it in a talk page to do so). Prod it in a week. Epthorn 15:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If this were anything other than Linux we wouldn't have even been attempting to keep it. A clear A7. Asserting that a club is a linux users group is not itself an assertion or even indication of any notability at all, unless one thinks all such user groups intrinsically important. DGG (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete club with no claim of notabilty, should have been speedied as a db-group. This is a Secret account 01:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as no assertion or notability. Bobby1011 02:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Week Keep The group seems to be notable, as Google turns up more than 46,000 results. However, it needs more references and content, in order to pass WP:ORG. —  Wen li  (reply here) 02:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * None of the first page of Google hits refers to the group in this article. Dougie WII 03:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nonnotable. – Mike . lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 03:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.