Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeMemorable


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

BeMemorable

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly-sourced article about a non-notable company. The sources are affiliated websites that apparently exist to prop up other websites with dubious awards. I am unable to find any reliable sources that cover the subject in depth. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. - MrX 13:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - MrX 13:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - MrX 13:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -There apparently no independent, reliable sources exist for the company. Fails WP:NCORP. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  23:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – several source searches are not providing coverage to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.