Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeRoTracker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mangojuice provided the best argument for deletion (be aware that just saying "not notable" will not carry much weight when faced with a good argument for inclusion). Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

BeRoTracker
Non-notable tracker program. Still a stub article. Doesn't seem to pass the proposed WP:SOFT criteria. Vossanova 17:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fagstein 07:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. – Hillel 16:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Importance. Stifle (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. It's free software, it's notable since it's an Impulse Tracker clone. See also the deletion review process for Schism Tracker. And, off-topic: what is happening to Wikipedia? Guaka 19:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Stifle and Vossanova. This piece of software is still in alpha testing, for crying out loud.  Mangojuice 22:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.