Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be Alright (Ariana Grande song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Be Alright (Ariana Grande song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources include trivial mentions of the song, at best. Notability lacking per WP:NSONG. Many many more articles like this one exist, so I'll only AfD this one first, to save community resources. That man from Nantucket (talk) 13:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Or is it more appropriate to just redirect instead? I can imagine fans will get their knickers in a twist over this, but the encyclopedia is filled with such articles of little value.  When you dive into the sources, this becomes more apparent.That man from Nantucket (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - It passes NSONGS. Numerous charting, live performances, 43 sources, third patty sources. I can't see why this is even being nominated.  — Calvin999  14:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, a major song for the artist, many reasons to keep which I won't even list because this will probably be a snow. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't go as far as saying it was a major song of Grande's, but it definitely passes NSONGS. — Calvin999  14:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I wrote 'major' because it was the first single released off an album, was introduced on Saturday Night Live, it highlighted a tour, etc. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * None of those things particularly make it major but.. anyway, off topic. — Calvin999  15:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as it has enough coverage to support its notability. Aoba47 (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep song about notable song. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:23, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - ignoring chart appearances and trivial mentions of the song within reviews of the parent album, there are multiple examples of coverage beyond passing mentions such that a standalone article is reasonable.  gongshow  talk  21:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.