Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be Here Now Acoustic Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Be Here Now Tour. The Bushranger One ping only 03:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Be Here Now Acoustic Collection

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page should be deleted as the album is a very obscure collection of bootlegs and is not an official Oasis album, in addition to not having any citations or anywhere to receive any citations from. s.o.m.e.g.u.y.4.3.2. 13:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with article on Be Here Now Tour - the article says that the songs are recordings of songs on this tour, and is only a brief article which could be merged with the article on the tour quite easily. Vorbee (talk) 14:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: the article for the Be Here Now tour needs a lot of work to pass notability itself – the one RS just mentions it in passing (and not even by name), everything else in the article is OR. This article certainly fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM, but I'm not sure at the moment if it's worth merging and redirecting, and if so, where it should be redirected to. Richard3120 (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with Be Here Now Tour, admittedly that article needs some work but there are plenty of sources out there for it.08:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.