Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be Ugly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Be Ugly

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find evidence that this meets WP:N in itself, or is worth, considering the lack of notability and sources, a redirect to Ugly Betty. Boleyn (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Health and fitness, Advertising,  and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 23:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - I couldn't find anything on this. Redirecting the two words, are just redirecting a negative, and probably would be better deleted entirely. — Maile (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.