Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Priestley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Bea Priestley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nikki ♥  311   01:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Nikki  ♥  311   01:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication or evidence of Notability. Looks mean, though.  PK T (alk)  02:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete — fails WP:GNG, page itself seems to be copied entirely from here.  Laurel Wreath of Victors ‖ Speak 💬 ‖  05:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete user is repeatedly creating articles for non-notable wrestlers which are lifted directly from the Prowrestling Wikia site. 86.3.174.49 (talk) 07:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: What is the significance of the championship she has won?  Is it major or minor? What is the NSPORTS criteria for similarly-situated pro wrestlers? Anyone know?  Montanabw (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and probably could be a WP:SPEEDY since the article is lifted from here. I think we still call that WP:COPYVIO. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No, not a copyvio, but lacking attribution. Wikia is licensed CC-BY-SA.  Schwede 66  21:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete is not notable.  Schwede 66  21:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable wrestler.. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.