Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Stays in the Picture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Bea Stays in the Picture

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:PLOT. It has been redirected three times but has been restored each time without any improvement. The only reference in the article is a ratings figure that is available in List of Fish Hooks episodes so the episode provides nothing more than is available in the main list article, except for a lengthy plot. AussieLegend (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I agree. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep seems like a well written plot of a episode. lots of those on wikipedia. i say keep anyway.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is never a valid keep argument in a deletion discussion. WP:PLOT says "Wikipedia articles should not be plot-only description of fictional works.". What policy could possibly justify keeping this article? --AussieLegend (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.