Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beacon Editor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Beacon Editor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The official web site has been taken over by a squatter and there is a complaint on the page that the topic may not be notable - since 2009. In these four years, it has evidently become less notable, not moreso. ke4roh (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - software article lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Ref provided from summer of code show that the software exists, but does not establish notability. A search turned up no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 04:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find any sources to support notability. The problem is that there is a blog by an editor of the Washington Free Beacon that is absorbing more of the hits. The "official website" appears to now be a news source for American health insurance, so the product doesn't seem to exist any longer either, which means that it won't become more important over time. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.