Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beacon House School System, Pakistan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator after Gazpacho's edits and subsequent renaming of article. Danny Lilithborne 21:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Beacon House School System, Pakistan
Unlike other articles by this author, the Beacon House School System is not a hoax. However, the article as it stands is horribly written, and lacks sources, reading like an advertisement. I'd be surprised if more than half of this information were true, as well, given who it comes from. Right now, even though it's not a hoax, I don't think it's notable enough for inclusion in the English Wikipedia and should be deleted, but I'm willing to withdraw the nomination if a real expert can clean up this article to fit WP standards. Danny Lilithborne 21:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Also listed under this AfD:
 * List of Beacon House Campuses, Central Region


 * Keep the system article per WP:BIAS, trim, and merge the campus info. Gazpacho 21:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep system article and merge the schools list in. Does the article have writing flaws? Yes, possibly due to the OE not speaking English as a first name. Does that make the subject inherently non-notable? No. That's why we have cleanup tags. That said, I don't see anything added by the list; that information can be incorporated into the main article as well. Further keep article as part of the schools Wikiproject and per WP:BIAS as noted by Gazpacho —C.Fred (talk) 00:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I put in a cleanup tag twice. It was removed by User:Bret John after simply adding more stuff to the article, without any real attempt at cleaning anything up. As I said, if an expert on the topic can clean up the article, and not someone whose only other edits are to hoax articles, I would withdraw my nom. Danny Lilithborne 00:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: OK, I went in and reorganized the article, removing a lot of "we're the best" fluff. Haven't merged the central campuses yet. Gazpacho 05:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks pretty good. It should probably be moved to Beaconhouse Group.  In lieu of that, I'll withdraw my nomination. Danny Lilithborne 05:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gazpacho and rename to Beaconhouse Group like suggested. Silensor 06:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.