Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beadle and tatum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Beadle and tatum

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The individuals already have their own articles so this page is redundant. There is no way  to redirect to both articles otherwise I would have done so. ukexpat (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The two scientists are highly notable and this is a plausible search term.  Would it be appropriate to turn this page into a pseudo-disambiguation page? Something like:
 * For information on the work of George Wells Beadle and Edward Lawrie Tatum, see articles on:
 * George Wells Beadle
 * Edward Lawrie Tatum
 * FreeKresge (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to either one. If you redirect to one you'll immediately find a link to the other right there in the first paragraph. This doesn't need to be deleted. - IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 00:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.