Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beagle (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Beagle (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article created by a blocked sock of a paid editor. Previously G11-ed, but declined. While I am nominating the article for deletion as a WP:NOTADVERTISING violation, the subject's notability seems borderline at best. Despite Microsoft's backing the startup hasn't generated coverage that would clearly meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Rentier (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:NOTSPAM. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam created by a professional spammer for an unnotable company. Declining the G11 nomination was silly. Breaking sticks (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Creator has now been indef blocked as well as other connected accounts. -- HighKing ++ 20:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam, fails WP:SPIP, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 20:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.