Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beal myth

Beal myth
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

And it goes on, see above. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 09:06, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete.
 * Delete. It is a duplicate of another vfd-article written by the same author. --*drew 09:12, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete (the text is a copy from other articles on VFD by same author) Sietse 09:37, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. NeoJustin 15:44, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, along with its kith. Vandal work. Geogre 18:57, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why is it here? Inky 01:43, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, should be a candidate for speedy. Gazpacho 04:24, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Should be a speedy delete. Vandal myth.  Postdlf 23:01, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * The current Texas A&M roster is online, btw. Guess who's not on it?  Postdlf 23:07, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Nought 22:57, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm going to guess without looking that it is Clay Beal. Am I right? :)NeoJustin 00:30 Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Why hasn't this been deleted yet? This and the other two are all crap, and one got deleted, so why not these? Do we really need separate VFDs for duplicate forgeries? Come on! - Vague Rant 06:33, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)