Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bean to cup machines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Bean to cup machines

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, but advertising spam. StAnselm (talk) 11:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Cautious keep but only if it is rewritten. It almost looks like an advert, except it is mentioning a number of different manufacturers.  The prose is unencylopedic, and does contain a lot of POV.  However, if it could be rewritten to describe in better detail how the coffee is prepared and brewed, and in a more technical manner (maybe like Chocolate) then it could be kept.  As it stands though, deletion is required. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyviolation of . Also agree with nom that this is spam as presented. Ros0709 (talk) 11:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Ros0709 and nom. Atyndall93  |  talk  13:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as copyvio without prejudice to recreation if someone were to write a NPOV sourced article about this topic, which is a valid one. ~ mazca talk 15:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete if this is a copyvio. But a rewritten version could be useful at some stage. Ashton1983 (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral Once I have time I'll try to rewrite this as a non-copyvio. The concept is likely notable, but the POV and copyvio need to be removed. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Userfy for TPH. In the meantime, delete - this appears to be the marketing equivalent of a white paper. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 16:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete copyvio --Pustefix (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.