Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bear Silber

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:10, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Bear Silber
Vanity. "Bear Silber" music gets zero Google hits. "BearSilber" gets only 23, none of which bear any apparent connection to this article's namesake. Denni &#9775; 03:32, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)


 * Please refer to . It's not vanity, it's biography.
 * Comment made by 69.107.55.113 (talk &middot; contributions)
 * We need more third party references than your official web site to verify how noteworthy you are. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Currently, I cannot find any third party references to verify this and/or to prove that this person passes WP:MUSIC. I get zero hits on Amazon and IMDB. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * He falls under this:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines

6. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.


 * No, you still have not proven that "the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability." In other words, please provide credible third party references to back up your claims. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 10:02, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Vanity, nn. I guess savage internet guerilla marketing means spamming Wikipedia nowadays. jni 11:27, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, musician vanity. WP is not advertising. --bainer (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless evidence requested by Zzyzx11 is given. Dcarrano 01:10, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 07:37, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete cannot find any valid resources that substantiate information. Runix 19:54, 15 Jul 2005
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.