Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bear flag revolt (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 16:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Bear flag revolt (band)
Band with 1 release, no label info, no evidence they meet WP:MUSIC. Not on AMG, etc. --W.marsh 04:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Josh Parris #: 04:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * why would being on amg be a sign of legitimacy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.19.219.215 (talk • contribs)
 * Because they tend to add at least a shell or blurb after a band/artist is reviewed by critics in notable publications, has a label and releases on it, has major sales, etc. You know, that there's interest out there. --W.marsh 19:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

how is it hurting the encyclopedia to make it more inclusive of smaller musical acts?
 * Keep if recorded. If not delete. -- JJay 21:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Liberatore(T) 16:35, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.