Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bearpaw (footwear)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Bearpaw (footwear)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company does not appear to be notable. I couldn't find any reliable sources on the company, the source in the article itself is a press release, as is the external link that isn't the company website.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  17:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article is about a popular brand of footwear, which is considered the less expensive version of Ugg Australia. Google news has coverage. Article could use some expansion, not deletion. Tinton5 (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - a few clicks at Google news finds lots of reliable sources such as Bizjournals, Women's Wear Daily, etc. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.