Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beastron 3000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete (speedy deletion criterion G3, silly vandalism).  howch e  ng   {chat} 18:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Beastron 3000, Beastron
We really need to BJAODN this. It's fricken funny (and an interesting foreshadowing of the future?) But it doesn't belong here. Grandmasterka 05:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not quite sure it's worthy of BJAODN... I guess my sense of humor differes from Grandmasterka's. ;) Hbackman 05:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might be a BJAODN, but will abstain on that part of the vote. :) --Kinu 05:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC) See below.
 * Keep. It is a legitimate explanation of a piece of history. This is not just a joke. It really did happen. A lot of people still talk about this character and event across Canada. Please reconsider. --Beastron 05:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and strong BJAODN after that comment! --Kinu 06:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete... not really chuckle-inducing enough for BJAODN. A drian L amo ··  06:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * '''I think the net quota of humor in the world went down when this article was written. --Agamemnon2 09:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, joke article. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-07 09:39Z 
 * Delete makey-uppy. not funny enough for BJAODN. in fact, not funny at all. Camillus (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Toasters, bananas, longjohns? This is Patent nonsense and has been tagged accordingly. Avi 17:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy would only be BJAODN if there were a picture...--Isotope23 18:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.