Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeatPick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – Will (message me!) 17:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Expanding on this. Basically, most of the keep votes had nothing to do with the article. ConMan has a good summary of what I'm meaning to say. It's a weak consensus to delete it, but it's consensus.

Will (message me!) 17:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Restored on user request. (re-reviewed, no consensus) Will (message me!) 17:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

BeatPick
Website spam Koffieyahoo 10:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * keep, because it's important to have a directory of projects using creative commons licensing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zumodekt (talk • contribs) 23:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * User's only contributions have been to the article, this AfD, and adding it to a list of projects using CC licenses. Confusing Manifestation 14:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep – their ideas at openbusiness.cc are pretty good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.0.221.95 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe it's good to have a directory of such products, but Wikipedia is not the place for that directory.Confusing Manifestation 14:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Deli nk 15:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks notable, but article could use some cleaning up. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk   (RFC)  16:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Added: looks about as notable as Magnatune. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk   (RFC)  16:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - these new businesses are promoting a new way of doing business. We are assisting a cultural revolution and it's important to document it.Mattias
 * Comment: For whatever reason, has no contributions.  The above comment was actually by, their first edit. Deli nk 17:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. Kimchi.sg 19:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks notable, and the article appears to have been cleaned up since the nomination. Madd4 Max 14:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A brief skim through the website highlights the number of artists signed. Google shows enough notability (~53,000 hits). Article looks fine. &mdash; 199 19:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Over 98% op the hits come from MySpace.com pages. Koffieyahoo 05:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I am sorry Koffieyahoo but what you say is untrue. google "beatpick myspace". it returns 12000. 53000 minus 12000 is 41000. also there are only 3 myspace links on the first 5 google pages. Joan
 * Comment You are aware that google filters out hits for a single domain where there are lots of them? If you do a search on BeatPick and go to the 25th page with hits on them, you'll get a message that only 248 are returned because the others come from similar domains. But, yes okay, the 98% might be a bit overstated.-- Koffieyahoo 02:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.