Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Persuasion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Aitias // discussion  02:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Beat Persuasion

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nominated for speedy. Subject seemed to have some claim to notability due to namedropping of various notable artists that have articles. No vote. Ryan Delaney talk 10:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Even if the article survives AfD, it will need cleanup to meet Wikipedia standards.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  10:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The reason that this page SHOULD NOT be deleted is simple. This band that I enjoy, with a producer, ZAK BANEY, that already has a Wikipedia page and a history of creating "new styles of music" such as Acid Breaks (also in Wikipedia) has created a "whole nes genre of music, Electro Nu Wave Disco"... this seems important to me and to musician and music fans everywhere, especially considering everything the two people in the band have accomplished already in the world of my pusic.  All of it is true and irrefutable.  If indeed the band should break up and the new genre they are persuing is prooved to be "irrevelent" then history shall be that judge, not a person with a program that simply searches out any page that has the name BAND on it. Thank you and please reconsider.  Scotchontherocks (talk) 08:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Comment copied from article talk page
 * Your arguments would be more persuasive if they referred to Wikipedia guidelines on notability for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Drawn Some (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Lack of no news coverage had me tagging this one with a speedy tag. Delete unless completely-rewritten. Alexius08 (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reason to believe subject is notable. Enjoyment and producer are not relevant. Johnuniq (talk) 01:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.