Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Up a White Kid Day (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep as sourced and clears the WP:NFT hurdle. The choice of article name is an issue for the talk page and does not require AfD discussion. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-05-08 01:48Z 

Beat Up a White Kid Day

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was kept at its previous AfD. DRV overturned, because the closer produced evidence of his own in closing the debate. (Ideally, the AfD should evaluate all new evidence -- it's better to comment, inserting the new evidence, and let a neutral party close.) This AfD may wish to consider the new citations, listed in the closing of the last AfD. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the evidence found by Ianmanka in closing the first AFD. Event clearly happened and was notable for its racial controversy. While the title might seem to imply some sort of holiday, the article shows that it is the name the participants gave the event, not a version of WP:NFT. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  17:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per evidence provided by closing administrator in the prior AFD, plus the stockpile of third party references now provided within the article. There wasn't a need to relist this article when we have hundreds of thousands which really do need to be improved (or deleted).  Burntsauce 17:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I appreciate the procedural issues, but any dispute about the article itself seems to have been addressed by the addition of more sources. --JayHenry 18:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but possibly move to another name? Maybe "May First Racial Assaults" or something? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 21:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep--and I think Rawr hit on a good title for the article. DGG 01:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.