Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beati monoculi in terra caecorum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Beati monoculi in terra caecorum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Evidence suggests the true proverb is "in regione caecorum rex est luscus". Also, written like a personal reaction essay. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  20:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Would that evidence be supported by the Google Books search spoon-fed by the deletion nomination process? Both Latin phrases seem to be roughly equivalent in the amount of their coverage. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning delete per WP:NOT and WP:Use English. In addition to multiple versions of the proverb in Latin, there are versions in English, and apparently an older version in Hebrew. Cnilep (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete pure WP:NOT Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.