Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatport Music Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Listed for 20 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to establish a "keep" consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Beatport Music Awards

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable award from a single store. No indepentent sources or claims of notability. No non promotional sources found. Nothng suggests it is more than spam Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 18:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Well, this definitely won't be spam because Beatport is a huge store for legal downloads of dance music. Moving onto the award, I'm not entirely sure it's notable as a standalone award, yet Beatport are a notable site - In their strand of music, it'd be akin to an Amazon Book Awards - And this gives the awards significant credibility in dance music, I'm just not 100% sure that translates to credibility beyond that. So I will say weak keep. I would not oppose deletion, because there isn't too much in the way of assertion of notability within the article, it is just worth noting that Beatport certainly aren't small time at all. Esteffect (talk) 22:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Being a huge store does not stop spam from being spam. This afd is not about Beatport. It is about their music awards. Any notability of Beatport is not inherited by anything Beatport might do. The example you mention of Amazon Book Awards is only notable if it satisfies by itself a notability criterea such as has recieved significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Being related to Amazon is not good enough. Being related to Beatport is not good enough. As it stands there is no independent reliable sources. Duffbeerforme (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.