Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrice Mary Barth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - It appears they are notable, but the article definitely needs to be expanded to show this. Nominator withdrawal as WP:SNOW applies with this new information. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo (talk) 23:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Beatrice Mary Barth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO - a piano teacher is not notable in of itself. Kirbanzo (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment as creator: There are many more sources on this woman, I've started including some of them in the article and will include more as time premits. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Snow keep: There is a long-standing agreement that people with an entry in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography have inherent notability, with the exception of a handful of representative entries (listed at the DNZB article). As Barth isn't a representative entry but has a listing due to her notability, this AfD should be withdrawn. There are a few dozen AfD precedents covering DNZB bios; they were all kept.  Schwede 66  21:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:09, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, but expand. Agree with the reasoning of User:Schwede66. Moriori (talk) 23:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.