Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeauSandVer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

BeauSandVer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't see how this can meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 08:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Neither can I. So let's delete or redirect it somewhere. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect / Selective paste merge to St Albans. I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, though a 2009 Sunday Times article confirms that it is a sixth-form consortium "consisting of Verulam, Beaumont and Sandringham schools". By the way, a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=sixth+form+consortium&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go Wikipedia search for sixth form consortium] finds several articles that aren't any better referenced and could probably be dealth with similarly. Qwfp (talk) 13:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * See also Articles for deletion/La Swap Sixth Form and Articles for deletion/Hillsyde Federation Boleyn (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non article. Szzuk (talk) 16:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge a brief summary to the artile on each of the three participating schools. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to St Albans, or just delete. We don't usually deal with non-notable programmes at this level. --Bejnar (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete- This seems awfully trivial to dignify with an encyclopedia article. Are we going to document every instance of universities agreeing on things amongst themselves. Naturally the only sources in the article or which I can find anywhere are not independent of the institutions; thus, the article fails WP:N. Reyk  YO!  05:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Just delete it. Contrary to Reyk these aren't universities, they're ordinary secondary schools.  BeauSandVer amounts to a timetabling agreement between three local schools with pupil-sharing, a minibus service, and some guest speakers.  We shouldn't have an article and there's nothing encyclopaedic to merge.  It's not a plausible search term for uninvolved people and there are no encyclopaedic grounds for a redirect.— S Marshall  T/C 18:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.