Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaumaris Hotel, Sheringham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Beaumaris Hotel, Sheringham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No credible notability claims, no significant source coverage. Fails WP:GNG. I am unable to turn up anything but passing mentions. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete by criterion A7: there is no indication of importance. (There are no doubt many two-star hotels in Sheringham, and many Edwardian buildings. The building looks unremarkable.)--A bit iffy (talk) 22:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete We need to draw the line somewhere. (Tho I recognize the inexactness of the designation, I think it's generally agreed that 4 start hotels are notable, & can be presumed to have references. I think it should equally be presumed that this is not the case for 2-star, except possibly in a region where there are almost no hotels. They could properly be mentioned in the article on the locality--perhaps a redirect is indicated. I've recently turned down some Prods of the nom's on three-start hotels, as warranting general discussion here, and I expect we'll see them at AfD . I'm not sure what I think about those. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
 * Delete -- Again I have reverted User:Stavros1 blanking of an article that he created. I consider the hotel of no architectural merit, so that I see no reason for not deleting it.  Peterkingiron (talk) 11:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 13:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete hotel not in a heritage building and a mere 21 rooms. we're not a hotel listing. LibStar (talk) 06:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Weakish keep Seems to be related to golf. As hotels go it is weak notability but I wouldn't go as far as to say it should be deleted., , , , , , , , , , ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  16:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Those links are just the passing, routine mentions that one would expect for a hotel (and some of the links appear not to bring up the hotel).--A bit iffy (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.