Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaumont Arms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Beaumont Arms

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not an obviously notable pub. I declined a CSD A7 as there are a few news pieces in the Bolton News about change of ownership, and the "community pub" concept suggested there could be enough to write about a piece of minor local history. Having dug around for sources, it seems this is one of many, many estate pubs all over Britain, though I have to give it credit for still being open and serving customers, as many are not. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Non-notable pub and my searches found nothing aside from listings and I would've suggested moving elsewhere but there's no target. SwisterTwister   talk  23:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 00:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: The present article is non-encyclopedic. It lacks a lede, provides no context for notability or any significance of the place even within its region. That a perfect researcher and a gifted writer might discover something to say is possible, but such a person wouldn't lodge the article at this name in the first place. (When people debate the real vs. the perfect article, they need to take into account also the namespace of the page and whether its useful to researchers.) An article that ends in a question mark is begging the question, you might say. This one is answering itself: pure localism. Hithladaeus (talk) 02:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.