Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful Books


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GRBerry 21:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Beautiful Books

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A publishing house would seem to just about miss WP:CSD despite the fact that the article has no real assertion as to why they're a notable publishing house. Declined speedy so brought here for wider discussion. Pedro : Chat  12:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not properly cited, should fall into a WikiProject, which it doesn't. Not notable.  Limetolime  Talk to me • look what I did! 13:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no independent sources, no indication of passing WP:CORP. Huon (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable... just a commercial for a book publisher. Teapotgeorge (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or tag as unsourced. Gdavid3 (talk) 03:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.