Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful Times (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ultraviolet (EP). (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 01:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Beautiful Times
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. Only notable mention is the Rolling Stones article. 91st on the Japanese Hot 100 just ain't gonna get it done either. Safiel (talk) 00:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. I reverted to the redirect but the editor insisted that there was material. Agree with nominator. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I would also be fine with delete, redirect and salting the redirect, if other users desire that a redirect be kept. Safiel (talk) 02:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Aside from one charting, there's not much and it fits better with the album article. SwisterTwister   talk  04:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Ultraviolet (EP). bd2412  T 16:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Ultraviolet (EP). The song is not notable enough for a standalone article. Random86 (talk) 23:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.