Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautisol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Beautisol

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appealed speedy. I see no real  indication that the company was notable--the references are essential PR and product mentions.  DGG ( talk ) 07:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unable to find any news sources other than press releases, or any other reliable sources covering the product in any depth. Bongo  matic  09:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim made for notability, no external news coverage. LK (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was able to find some coverage in Us magazine, but I don't think this story is enough to turn this product line into something that's had significant effects on culture, history, or technology. Not the sort of thing that belongs in an encyclopedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as a commercial advertisement. Carrite (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant coverage in secondary sources, no credible claim to notability. --bonadea contributions talk 11:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.