Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty Holding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 18:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Beauty Holding

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable new (less than 1 year old) company. References are all blogs. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC) The article is about a new online social network, not a business or company. References are to major TV (CNBC) or online media sources (Urban Daddy, nu.nl). Definitely worth keeping Nasdarq —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.221.48 (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 13:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Speedily okay by me. I don't see any indication of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, It's not notable, and seems to be close, if not an advertisement.-- SKATER  T. 12:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.