Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaver contest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Beaver contest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced article about a contest or initiative. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT. - MrX 15:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and the article fails WP:GNG--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like said above fails WP:GNG. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as an incomprehensible word salad. Bearian (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. This is a large computer and informatics contest for young folk. It's claimed that over 500,000 students participated last year from 27 countries. It's listed as one of the top three contests by the OCG, but I don't know if this is enough by itself for notability. For such a large contest, I've been unable to find multiple in-depth independent RS discussing it, but this could just be my incompetence at finding education-related RS. As it stand, this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. If others find good RS, I'm happy to change my recommendation. --Mark viking (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried to fix this - got rid of some copyvio, etc, but couldn't find anything making it notable, hence the tag I added. I agree with Mark viking, it's too soon and not yet notable enough. Dougweller (talk) 11:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.