Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaverton, Montana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. NorthAmerica1000 19:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Beaverton, Montana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously; meets WP:GEOLAND, real place recognized by the US govt; being a gazetteer is one of the Five pillars.... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per Carlos. It's a "populated place" according to the GNIS government database. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * While a poorly sourced article about a neighbourhood within a larger municipality can be redirected to the larger topic instead of standing alone as a separate article, any populated place that has really existed is always entitled to either an article or a redirect and may never be deleted as "non-notable" under WP:GEOLAND. Keep unless a viable redirect target can be identified. Bearcat (talk) 23:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per others. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn my error. Thanks to the participants, Boleyn (talk) 08:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.