Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaverton 911 truth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Beaverton 911 truth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable 9/11 conspiracy group. Contested speedy deletion, and with comment left by one of the admins, I felt it may be better to bring to AfD. No reliable sources can be found to verify any notability. Wildthing61476 02:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'll be reporting these people to my contacts within the secret labs. =^_^= -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 02:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, or move to PROD. Non-notable, no sources, and article contradicts itself in talking about the founding of the group. GrooveDog 02:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I placed the speedy tag based on WP:ORG. --Evb-wiki 04:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Karl Rove and the baby eating neo-conservative cabal paid me a million dollars to say this group isn't sourced or notable. Nick mallory 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess that's how much Nick needs to be bribed in order to vote "delete"...JUST KIDDING, please don't take offence...but yest, he's right. The group is not notable. Placeholder account 04:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice one Placeholder Nick mallory 08:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable conspiracy theory mentalists Bigdaddy1981 05:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN local schism of loosely-defined conspiracy theory "movement" Eggishorn 05:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I like one of the group's goals: "Educate the public to the existence of groups such as the Skull and Bones, Illuminati, Bohemian Grove, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Committee of 300, and the true beliefs behind the Freemasonry." That almost makes the article worth saving for entertainment value, but since we're an encyclopedia, we can't really do that.  So, delete this article and send a shipment of tinfoil hats to Beaverton, Oregon.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 13:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, we might be able to. The term BJAODN comes to mind. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom of WP:NOTE. Darn Tinfoilhatters don't even have a website for my personal amusement. Lipsticked Pig 23:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - yet another non-notable 9/11 "Truth" group. Not notable enough to be merged into 9/11 Truth Movement.  (Also, not that this is an argument for deletion, but it's one of the most POV 'articles' I've come across recently -- "Group goal: [to] expose the fact that rogue elements of the U.S. Government orchestrated the events of 9/11", indeed!) -- simxp (talk) 21:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another group of people creating conspiracy rumours. Skullblade 00:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.