Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bebe Zeva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I see a rough consensus to delete, with User:Mbinebri staking the strongest position. Kubigula (talk) 03:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Bebe Zeva
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Useless page about irrelevant personality Kristinelang (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. Clearly a fashion writer; several solid sources. That she's young (late teens) in the fashion world isn't a minus, but a plus, because fashion is extra-important to teenaged females, and my sense is she's a fashion leader; she'll probably become more influential over time. Still, at present, she's somewhat borderline in notability, but I think on the side of "keep".--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. If and when she becomes more influential, then she will have a page that fulfills WP notability. She's more a blogger then a writer, and not a very famous one at that. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Writing articles for websites is not the same as being covered by them, and I find it hard to be impressed when those websites are the variety that call themselves magazines to sound more credible than they likely are. The Seventeen magazine source is something, but I'd prefer to have more than a three-minute interview to establish this blogger as notable.  Gnews returns nothing.    Mbinebri   talk &larr; 14:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: Not a notable person in any way shape or form. I got to this page from this individual's personal facebook page and I surmise that she wrote most of it herself. 76.98.237.76 (talk) 15:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - I am voting to keep this for a couple reasons. It was just submitted and closed at the beginning of the month. Both submitters are new red linked accounts with minimal edit history which leads me to the possibility of sockpuppetry and most importantly I personally don't like the "notability" argument for this one. It seems like there are some mid grade references and several of them so I see no need to hurry and delete this. Its not hurting anything other than being of dubious notability IMO. --Kumioko (talk) 16:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. her entry on Thought Catalog says: "Bebe Zeva is a seventeen year old ex-suburbanite from Las Vegas, Nevada. BIO Bebe Zeva attends high school online and identifies herself as a cool-hunter, people-watcher, and relevant wallflower. She intends to pursue a career in journalism and sociology, earning an income doing exactly what her mother said not to do: judge people." That's good enough for me. Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 05:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.