Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becci Harrold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Becci Harrold

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is an amateur equestrian. Article does not make any claims that appear to satisfy notability requirements of WP:ATH: two awards cited, one of which is "3rd in the Best Use Of Social Media By An Amateur Rider category of the Equestrian Social Media Awards". Searching Google News, including archives, for (becci harrold) turns up nothing. A Google Web search for (becci harrold) turns up her own website, some YouTube links, some Facebook pages, and appearance on some lists of results, but no evidence of non-trivial coverage by independent sources. Unless significant coverage in print-only sources can be shown, she appears to fail WP:GNG. Ammodramus (talk) 17:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete sources are insufficiently reliable to establish notability, as per WP:RS and WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:32, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, a couple of minor awards, and very little in the way of indepth third party coverage. Not there yet as far as WP:ATHLETE goes.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.