Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bechara Nammour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Bechara Nammour

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A very ordinary businessman: no evidence of notability by Wikipedia's criteria. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - multiple references in reliable sources are provided in the article, several of which a full lenght articles dedicated to the subject LoverOfTheRussianQueen (talk) 14:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It is interesting to see what the author of this article (LoverOfTheRussianQueen) calls "several ... full length articles dedicated to the subject". Of the 6 apparent references given in the article two are duplicates, leaving 4 actual different references. Of these 4, 3 give single sentence mentions of the subject of the article. E.g. | this article is about Kevin Callaway having a new job, and the only reference to Nammour is the statement that Callaway "will report to Chairman Bechara Nammour"; likewise | this is about Manakish Zaatar, and mentions that he once worked for Nammour - again the only mention of Nammour. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I was referring to this article, which is a full length interview with Nammour. LoverOfTheRussianQueen (talk) 14:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is the only one you could possibly have been referring to: it is the one out of the 4 references with more than a single sentence mention. One article: compare "several of which a full lenght articles dedicated to the subject". It could, I suppose, be an interview, though it doesn't read like one (no direct quotes, for example). Or it could be something else, such as a write up of a press release. In any case, on its own it is a little minimal to regard as substantial coverage. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. fails WP:BIO. While the company he chairs may be notable, Bechara is not. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions.--Hu12 (talk) 17:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless significant coverage of this person by reliable sources are found Corpx (talk) 22:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.