Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becky Curtis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Becky Curtis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * You tell us. Uncle G (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks notable. MyDog22 (talk) 11:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC) removing sock !vote
 * That doesn't help. It's as useless to the closing administrator as Alan Liefting's rationale is.  Please follow the link above, see what a good rationale comprises, and give one.  That will give the closing administrator something to hang xyr hat on. Uncle G (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That's not even policy. What's wrong with voting based on my emotional reaction to the article like everyone else? MyDog22 (talk) 12:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Disregard this last comment: user has been banned indefinitely as a sock puppet. Drmies (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability criteria require that information in an article must be verifiable from multiple reliable sources, but the sources cited don't fit that requirement- one of the sources is the singer's own MySpace page, and the other is a blog that barely mentions her.  I did a google search, but couldn't turn up any better sources.  In addition, if her best claim to notability is as a backup singer, I don't think she meets the list of guidelines for includsion at WP:MUSIC.  See?  That's how you do it!  :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fritzpoll (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:BIO. No significant coverage by external sources. LK (talk) 17:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems notable, but I couldn't find anything at all. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.