Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bed (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Bed (book)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

seemingly non notable with no RS to attest to notability Theserialcomma (talk) 21:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Cannot see how this passes WP:BK. Grey Wyvern ⚒ 22:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete author is marginally notable at best, his article doesnt show any sign of traditional notability, only fringe sources and small press publishers. this author really doesnt qualify for separate articles on his books. i would suggest that other titles be afd'd as well. my critique of the promotional nature of the authors article will be saved for its talk page, unless someone also nominates his article for deletion, which im neutral on.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (or possibly merge) - For the reasons detailed above, the books don't warrent separate articles. No third-party sources either to establish notability. Lord Spongefrog,  (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!)  21:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.