Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedar Mnagrio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. There is a WP:RS, and we do need to bear in mind WP:CSB. But there is one source, and after three weeks nobody has, it seemed, turned up anything else. Unfortunatly, as this is a BLP, we need to do better. If additional reliable sources can be found, this can be WP:REFUNDed. The Bushranger One ping only 02:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Bedar Mnagrio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NWRITER and fails WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  18:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not sure how the nominator managed to miss this, as it was already cited in the article before nomination, but the subject has an entry in the Encyclopedia Sindhiana published by the Sindhi Language Authority. Or do non-Western sources not count for some reason? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sick of your anti-West comments. Surely, I seen that but there is nothing for him other than that. We can't have article what SLA's Sindhiana has. We generally delete or redirect single sourced article. Störm   (talk)  17:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * There's nothing anti-West about my comment, but rather pro treating reliable sources on an equal basis wherever they originate from. You said that this had no coverage in WP:RS, which is blatantly untrue, unless you treat Sindhi sources as unreliable by definition. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Deleteper lack of soruces. Fails WP:BASIC my searches using the Latin alphabet turns up nothing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.