Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedazzled Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Bedazzled Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP, what coverage there is is limited to reports of band either signing or releasing records through this company (WP:INHERITED) but nothing about the company it's self. Codf1977 (talk) 11:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.