Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bede Academy, Blyth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Bede Academy, Blyth

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:NSCHOOL "All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools.. must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both" This article fails to do so. Was prodded but tag removed on the grounds that it's a secondary school located in the UK AusLondonder (talk) 07:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep expanded significantly since the deletion nomination, appears to meet WP:GNG NemesisAT (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easily enough here to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Except for significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * There are two articles from the BBC, the national British broadcaster, with singificant coverage. NemesisAT (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The BBC Tyne article from 2007 simply notes the school was granted planning approval and mentions controversies surrounding the Emmanuel Schools Foundation. The other article is about a threat from the academy to expel pupils if their parents parked illegally. AusLondonder (talk) 18:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * They still count as significant coverage

NemesisAT (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I'm afraid I really disagree that an article about illegal parking counts as significant coverage of this school. AusLondonder (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, a wide range of coverage as cited in the references section of the article. Stifle (talk) 08:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.