Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedford College (Australia) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per WP:CSD. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Bedford College (Australia)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page about non-profit a educational institution has never had sources other than links back to the school since page creation in 2006. Page was built entirely by NSW ip address(es) which even today still contribute and appear to have some COI association with the school, based on puffy language and "we" pronouns used. I've done a reasonable Gsearch and found nothing meeting RS. It's significant apparently no students of this institution have vandalized/contributed, which IMHO is unusual for such articles. It is entirely possible this business school doesn't meet standards for inclusion. In my Gsearch I did find one SEO consultant who includes their work for the subject in their brag page. I have no proof this is related, but I think it likely. BusterD (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. BusterD (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. BusterD (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. BusterD (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm aware this page was nominated for deletion earlier this year; the outcome was "Merge" but no sources could be found to verify the merge target. Leaving it unsourced is a bad idea. I know that "colleges" even private and religious ones are frequently "kept" in AFD but in this case, we have no sourcing anchors at all for an institution which claims to have been around for 70+ years. My reasonable BEFORE finds nothing. Happy to be shown I'm wrong. BusterD (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.