Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedford House Stables


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   14:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Bedford House Stables

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A unremarkable place. 333-blue 13:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage to be found. In addition, if anyone is willing to bother, look at the creator's edit history. As it happens it's filled with similar articles (with a few edits on big articles inbetween). Many of these other articles have been created by highly similar editor accounts dealing with articles concerning the horse hobby in the specific region. I'll give it the benefit of doubt and think the person's just been forgetting his or her password. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a British Listed building. I've added sourcing and some text. Needs to be expanded, but is fine as a stub. As a registered historic place, it satisfies notability. There's a fair amount of coverage on the web about this property's place in British horse racing history, and anyone in the U.K. should be able to find more than I did. — Maile  (talk) 15:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep So it is. A Grade II listed building in the UK. The relevant criteria is WP:GEOFEAT: Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and which verifiable information beyond simple statistics are available are presumed to be notable. Perhaps User:333-blue and Mr. Magoo would like to reconsider and withdraw their arguments. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Malcomx15 and Maile66. An editor subjectively considering this an unremarkable place isn't in itself a reason to delete.  It is a listed building and there is coverage.  I trust the opinions of Historic England than us editors, including myself. --Oakshade (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a listed building per WP:GEOFEAT. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as stated by Historic England, this is a notable listed building and I think passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 04:43, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.