Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bediol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  10:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Bediol

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG. It is a corporate product, but I don't find significant coverage in reliable sources. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 18:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough coverage to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: lack of reliable sources means significant coverage is not established.   Dr Strauss   talk   08:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.