Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedroom Boom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus was clear. In addition, the page is wholly unsourced and, despite the extended time, no evidence has been adduced that this record (hey that dates me!) meets WP:MUSIC. I would add that global ghits butters no parsnips; it is the quality of available sources that count. I see no reason not to set up a redirect, which I have. TerriersFan (talk) 22:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Bedroom Boom

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable  Chzz  ►  00:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep With 66,000 ghits, I'd say this is more than one of the countless unnotable hip-hop songs out there. Aardvarkvarkvark (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 23:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect, article fails WP:MUSIC & WP:RS. Redirect back to U.S.A. (United State of Atlanta).   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article doesn't assert notability and has no reliable 3rd party sourcing for verfiability. Also Wiki is not an advertisement for "Such as YouTube, Myspace, Google video and various others". Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources; fails notability under WP:MUSIC, etc. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.