Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeeHex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

BeeHex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company where all of the sourcing appears to be your standard press churn: the press about NASA is clearly self-promotion that it puts out in its press releases, and the rest of the sourcing all appear to tell similar stories that suggest lack of intellectual independence from the organization itself, which per recent changes at WP:CORPDEPTH and the guideline at WP:SPIP, don't count towards notability. Everything else is non-RS blogs, publications like TechCrunch, and your standard industry publications. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the above. Could use some salt as appears to be an ongoing issue here with COI. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet Wikipedia's notability. Needs more independent sources. QuackGuru  ( talk ) 18:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. thecompany is good at getting publicity. We shouldn't confuse that with reliable sourcing.  DGG ( talk ) 21:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete coverage is WP:MILL jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This company looks like it is not notable. If better sources can be found then maybe it can stay, but right now it looks like weak promotion.Huitzilopochtli1990 (talk) 01:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.